Analytic of the Sublime
Start reading Analytic of the Sublime
- § 23. Transition from the faculty which judges of the Beautiful to that which judges of the Sublime
- § 24. Of the divisions of an investigation into the feeling of the sublime
- § 25. Explanation of the term “sublime”
- § 26. Of that estimation of the magnitude of natural things which is requisite for the Idea of the Sublime
- § 27. Of the quality of the satisfaction in our judgements upon the Sublime
- § 28. Of Nature regarded as Might
- § 29. Of the modality of the judgement upon the sublime in nature
- § 30. The Deduction of aesthetical judgements on the objects of nature must not be directed to what we call Sublime in nature, but only to the Beautiful
- § 31. Of the method of deduction of judgements of Taste
- § 32. First peculiarity of the judgement of Taste
- § 33. Second peculiarity of the judgement of Taste
- § 34. There is no objective principle of Taste possible
- § 35. The principle of Taste is the subjective principle of Judgement in general
- § 36. Of the problem of a Deduction of judgements of Taste
- § 37. What is properly asserted a priori of an object in a judgement of Taste
- § 38. Deduction of judgements of Taste
- § 39. Of the communicability of a Sensation
- § 40. Of Taste as a kind of sensus communis
- § 41. Of the empirical interest in the Beautiful
- § 42. Of the intellectual interest in the Beautiful
- § 43. Of Art in general
- § 44. Of beautiful Art
- § 45. Beautiful Art is an art, in so far as it seems like nature
- § 46. Beautiful Art is the art of genius
- § 47. Elucidation and confirmation of the above explanation of Genius
- § 48. Of the relation of Genius to Taste
- § 49. Of the faculties of the mind that constitute Genius
- § 50. Of the combination of Taste with Genius in the products of beautiful Art
- § 51. Of the division of the beautiful arts
- § 52. Of the combination of beautiful arts in one and the same product
- § 53. Comparison of the respective aesthetical worth of the beautiful arts
- § 54. Remark